Professor Charles Kindleberger, from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, defined a bubble in the New Palgrave: A Dictionary of
Economics as:
“A bubble may be defined loosely as a sharp rise in the
price of an asset or a range of assets in a continuous process, with the initial
rise generating expectations of further rises and attracting new buyers –
generally speculators interested in profits from trading in the asset rather
than its use of earnings capacity.” (Eatwell et al, 1987)
What Kindleberger is implying with this definition is that
asset bubbles are created when assets are valued higher than what they are
intrinsically worth.
A warning pamphlet printed by the Dutch government, warning of the dangers of investing in Tulips |
There have been many examples of such asset price bubbles,
with the first real being the “Tulipmania” of the 1630’s when the price of tulip
bulbs reached astronomic levels, with some estimating that prices reached
approximately 10 times the annual wage of a skilled worker. Tulips were seen as
the “sure-thing investment” of the day, and this confidence that they would
always make an investor money lead to a severe case of hubris in the market.
Then, in February 1637 it was considered that tulips weren't as valuable
as their price indicated, and from February to May 1637 bulbs which
were once very valuable became basically worthless. Other notable asset bubbles
since Tulipmania have included the South Sea Bubble of 1720, “Railway Mania” in
the 1840’s and the Great Crash of 1929.
The Dot-Com bubble was caused mainly by excess speculation on
internet start-up companies, which saw stock markets grow very quickly for approximately
5 years, from 1995-2000. The boom and bust of the dot-com bubble draws very clear parallels with many previous asset bubbles throughout history. Clearly
lessons were not learned from these bubbles though, as history went on to repeat itself during this bubble. Over the next few posts I will consider what happened during the dot-com bubble and what happened when it burst?
No comments:
Post a Comment