One of the most fascinating stories from what I have read on
the dot-com bubble is that of Flooz.com. This was a company that was set up
with the premise of providing an “online currency” that would act as an
alternative to paying for things online with your credit card. You had to buy
Flooz from their website, or you could receive them as a kind of gift token
from other internet companies, and then you were able to use it at retail
partners that had signed up, including some notable firms such as Tower Records
and Barnes & Noble. The company even
had the public backing of Whoopi Goldberg (a signal of potential success?) and it
is estimated the company raised approximately $35million from investors.
Flooz went bankrupt in 2001, leaving many people with Flooz
that were now worthless. One point that I should make about Flooz.com and its
failure is that, as stated by its founder Robert Levitan, by mid-2001
approximately 19% of purchases of Flooz could be accounted for as fraudulent purchases. This may have accelerated its decline, but its fair to say that,
“the writing was on the wall” regardless.
The question I keep asking myself when I read about Flooz.com is why did anyone invest in it? Maybe hindsight makes this idea look so ridiculous, but why would anyone want to buy an “online currency” when they could just use the currency they already have? For the company to have raised so much money though, it must have struck some people as a good idea. Or maybe, people didn’t really think about what it was they were investing in, and they simply jumped on the bandwagon of another internet start-up with big ambitions, but one, like so many others, without a real sense of how to achieve those lofty ambitions.
A message from Osama Bin Laden, circa 2000 |
No comments:
Post a Comment